Coliving vs. Traditional Renting – For Today’s Urban Dwellers

The choice between coliving spaces in Bangalore and traditional renting has become pivotal for today’s urban dwellers in the ever-evolving urban landscape. Each option offers advantages and disadvantages, catering to different lifestyles, preferences, and priorities. 

Let’s examine the pros and cons of each to help you make an informed decision about your housing situation.


  • Community and Connection: One of the most significant advantages of coliving is the sense of community it fosters. Residents share coliving pg in Bangalore, experiences, ideas, and aspirations in a coliving space. This sense of camaraderie can lead to lasting friendships, professional collaborations, and a support system that enriches the overall living experience.
  • Flexibility: Many coliving spaces offer flexible lease terms, allowing residents to rent monthly or for shorter durations than traditional leases. This flexibility is ideal for digital nomads, short-term residents, or individuals still determining long-term housing needs.
  • Networking and Professional Growth: Coliving spaces often host events, workshops, and networking opportunities that facilitate professional growth and development. Whether it’s a skill-sharing session, a guest speaker series, or a networking mixer, these events provide residents with valuable opportunities to expand their networks, learn new skills, and advance their careers.

Traditional Renting:

  • Independence and Autonomy: Traditional renting offers a greater degree of freedom and autonomy compared to living. Renters have more control over their living space, including the ability to customize and decorate according to their preferences.
  • Isolation and Loneliness: One of the main drawbacks of traditional renting is the potential for isolation and loneliness, especially for individuals who live alone. Without the built-in community and social opportunities provided by coliving spaces, renters may find connecting with others in their building or neighborhood challenging.
  • Higher Costs: Renting a traditional apartment can be more expensive than coliving, especially in desirable urban areas where rental prices are high. In addition to rent, tenants may be responsible for utilities, furniture, and other expenses typically included in coliving arrangements.
  • Maintenance and Upkeep: Renters in traditional apartments are often responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of their living space, including repairs, cleaning, and landscaping. This can be time-consuming and costly, particularly for individuals who are not handy or need more resources to hire professionals.

Settl. coliving offers community, convenience, and cost-effectiveness, while traditional renting provides independence, privacy, and long-term stability. By carefully weighing the pros and cons of each option, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your housing needs and aspirations in today’s urban environment.